CIFI Ecosystem
  • CIFI 2.0 - Beyond Smart Cities
    • From Web2 to Web4 & Beyond
    • Society 5.0: Smart Cities and Integrated Systems
    • The Six Layers of Value Exchange
    • Micro-Economies: The Building Blocks of Society 6.0
    • Net Zero Financing: Aligning Capital with Planetary Health
    • AI and the New Computational Economy
    • Catalyzing the Transition to Society 6.0 Through Regenerative Finance
    • The 100 Day Incubator: Cultivating the Regenerative Economy
    • Creating NetZero Financing for Global Trade
    • Tokenizing Natural Capital: A New Asset Class for Preservation
    • Universal Data Points and Global Incentive Programs
    • The CUSD Stablecoin: Connecting Traditional Finance with Regenerative Economics
    • Smart Markets and Climate Finance Integration
    • Educational Impact and Capacity Building
    • The Role of the 100 Day Incubator
    • The Asset Tokenization Revolution
    • Smart Cities and Society 5.0 Integration
    • Creating a Multi-Stakeholder Economy
    • The Power of a Dual Token Ecosystem in Society 6.0
  • Build With CIFI
    • Community Contribution to Ecosystem Growth
    • Integration with the 100 Day Incubator
    • The CIFI Product Ecosystem
    • The Playground as Ecosystem Accelerator
  • Give With REFI Net
    • Technical Architecture: The Three Pillars of REFI Net
    • REFI Net for Philanthropy: Empowering Positive Global Impact
    • Smart Markets: Embedding Philanthropy into Economic Systems
    • Implementation for REFI Projects: The Incubator Connection
    • The Future of REFI Net: Evolving the System
  • Governance Of Circularity
    • The Three DAOs: Specialized Governance Bodies
    • The Technical Infrastructure: CIFI Town Hall System
    • From Centralization to Full Decentralization
    • Maximizing Token Value Through Governance Participation
    • Building on Circularity Finance: Governance as an Integration Point
    • Case Studies: Governance in Action
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Governance Of Circularity

Case Studies: Governance in Action

To illustrate how the Circularity Finance governance system works in practice, consider these hypothetical but realistic case studies:

Case Study 1: Protocol Fee Adjustment

Scenario: The ecosystem treasury needs additional funding for development initiatives, and a community member proposes adjusting protocol fees from 0.25% to 0.30%.

Governance Process:

  1. A CIFI VIP NFT holder formalizes the proposal in the TownHall contract, including economic analysis of the impact.

  2. The community debates the proposal in forums, with some advocating for alternative funding approaches.

  3. After discussion, the proposal is modified to include a sunset provision where the fee returns to 0.25% after six months.

  4. CIFI and REFI holders vote, with CIFI votes weighted more heavily for this protocol-level decision.

  5. The proposal achieves the required quorum and support threshold, entering the Approved state.

  6. After the 2-day timelock period, the proposal enters the Queued state.

  7. Executors register specific actions to update fee parameters across all relevant contracts.

  8. The actions are executed, implementing the fee change.

  9. A follow-up proposal is scheduled for five months later to evaluate the impact and determine whether to extend the higher fee.

This case demonstrates how a protocol-level change follows the complete governance flow, with appropriate debate, modification, and implementation.

Case Study 2: New Regenerative Asset Integration

Scenario: A project has developed tokenized biodiversity credits and wants to integrate them as collateral within the Circularity Finance ecosystem.

Governance Process:

  1. The project first goes through technical review in the RWA DAO working group.

  2. After technical validation, a proposal is created in both the RWA DAO and CIFI DAO, as this integration spans both domains.

  3. The RWA DAO evaluates the valuation methodology, risk parameters, and compliance aspects.

  4. The CIFI DAO considers the strategic alignment and protocol integration requirements.

  5. Both DAOs must approve the proposal, with the RWA DAO requiring a higher threshold due to the specialized nature.

  6. After approval and timelock, specialized executors with multi-sig authority implement the technical integration.

  7. Implementation includes a phased approach with initial conservative parameters.

  8. A monitoring period follows, with automatic reporting to both DAOs.

  9. After successful monitoring, a follow-up proposal adjusts parameters to optimize the integration.

This case illustrates coordination between multiple DAOs for complex decisions that span different domains of expertise and authority.

Case Study 3: Application Feature Enhancement

Scenario: Users of the REFIx Marketplace request a new feature for batch processing of carbon credit retirements to improve efficiency for corporate buyers.

Governance Process:

  1. The feature request is initially discussed in community channels.

  2. A REFI Governor NFT holder formalizes the proposal in the TownHall contract.

  3. Because this is an application-level change, voting primarily involves REFI token holders.

  4. The proposal includes implementation specifications and resource requirements.

  5. After approval, the REFI DAO allocates development resources from its treasury.

  6. A development team implements the feature, with regular progress updates to the community.

  7. The completed feature undergoes testing in the CIFI Playground.

  8. After successful testing, executors deploy the feature to production.

  9. Usage metrics are monitored and reported back to the REFI DAO.

This case demonstrates how application-specific enhancements are governed primarily through the REFI DAO, with appropriate focus on user needs and experience.

PreviousBuilding on Circularity Finance: Governance as an Integration Point

Last updated 2 days ago